00:00
00:00
jmtb02
Founder of Wonderful Elephant + jmtb02 Studios. Formally Armor Games CEO, previously at Kongregate, 100+ Flash games many of which featuring a little blue elephant

John Cooney @jmtb02

Age 38, He/Him

Game Developer

UC Davis

Northern California

Joined on 3/1/04

Level:
29
Exp Points:
8,746 / 9,340
Exp Rank:
4,446
Vote Power:
7.01 votes
Rank:
Corporal
Global Rank:
2,236
Blams:
1,543
Saves:
2,462
B/P Bonus:
22%
Whistle:
Bronze
Trophies:
107
Medals:
167
Supporter:
2y 4m 16d
Gear:
10

The Atrocities of Reviewing

Posted by jmtb02 - November 7th, 2007


Writing a good review takes a lot of talent, timing, and whimsy to catch the audience's attention. However, I was distraught by the attitude of the Newgrounds community by a recent review I wrote for a political animation.

I recently reviewed an animation concerning a political statement, and was barraged by one of the most immature responses I could have ever conceived. I quote the author response:

It's not very reasonable for you to complain to me about how I chose to express myself. You should do the reasonable thing and shut the hell up because this is an ANIMATION WEBSITE.

First off, this sentence makes absolutely no sense. How is it not reasonable to complain about his animation in a review? Isn't that the very nature of reviewing, is to state one's opinion on a public piece of work? I am also baffled by the idea that this is an animation website, thus the loss of right to make any sort of negative comment.

Second, I am concerned about the idea of people using the "Is this review helpful?" button as a measure of "I agree or disagree with this review". Really, isn't the point of that to say whether to state whether you think the review was well versed or not? Reviews are only helpful if written well, and I have to say, for all the work I put into that review, I was confused by the current 5 / 11 people who thought it was useful.

Sure, the animation is getting a 4.something and is doing well, but just because you take a different stance doesn't mean the review was not helpful.

Here is my review in full length, you can decide if it was helpful or not. God knows, it might get flagged as inappropriate in the days to come. I kindly ask the Newgrounds community to re-review their own review skills and reading, if for anything the sake of my sanity on this site.

"Summary: "Weak Argument, Terrible Message"

Wait, let me see if I have this right. You have issues with the government, so your response is to make a music-video length animation about the problems facing it without giving a clear platform or objective? This animation is the most misguided, unrealistic view of government and ways to fix it.

If you have a problem with something, do something reasonable about it.

Basically you could have done something awesome with your time. You have the talent, just a lack of direction. If you have a political stance, than god speed to you. But really, your textbook definitions and quotes from the Declaration of Independence are not going to save our media monopolies or whatever else you seemed to pace through way too quickly in the beginning... with everyone suddenly getting angry and taking over their government in a giant war for democracy.

The animation suffers far beyond your lack of focus. You subject looks like the devil, and I hate to break it to you, but portraying your protagonist as the devil doesn't really work when you want your audience to identify with the main subject. If memory serves me right, the devil is typically a negative, non-associated character. And several times the pacing was just irregular and awkward. It makes it hard to understand what you are trying to say (but overall, I had no clue what you were trying to say... besides burn and kill Capitol Hill because you hate our government policies)?

Next time, take your catchy song and do something more meaningful with yourself. I'm waiting for your nonchalant "I'LL DO WHATEVER I WANT" response from other reviews, because really, it fits your "rebellion will triumph!" attitude about things... skewed, illogical, and definitely among those who will sit in the backseat complaining with no solution or guidance.

-J


Comments

You're right, people should take more care when responding to reviews - I think there should be separate buttons for "Was this response to the review helpful/abusive?". It would be nice if there was some kind of tutorial maybe that everyone HAS to watch the first time they try to review or respond, and the tutorial would say things that you should or shouldn't say in a review, along with how to use the abuse buttons properly.
There's definately over-use of the "abusive review" buttons as well - just look at the last page of Waterlollies reviews when you sort them by score. All of them have 10+ abuse points, even though none of them are actually abusive. Maybe the "Yes/No/Abusive" buttons should be restricted to people above a certain level, or something like that.

Nice rant-type-thing, I can never write my thoughts together coherantly.

"First off, this sentence makes absolutely no sense. How is it not reasonable to complain about his animation in a review"

to be honest you should never truly 'complain' you should criticize, and give CONSTRUCTIVE criticism and feedback...

since you DID give CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, fuck him...

to be honest, he aint worth your time, i can imagine how fucked off you are, after writing an essay *not taking the piss but it is a long and through review/rant* (review before rant however)

for him to just say "THIS IS AN ANIMATION WEBSITE STFU" i mean... you obviously know what kinda of site this is...

and you obviously know theres whiny little cunts that cant take even a slight bad word to them

so to be honest fuck-em, there not even worth your time

People who are not ready to have their ideas attacked, attack back with unreasonable, and ambiguous comments in hope to confuse their assailant into shutting up. Since there is no way to continue an argument or debate, they figure "hey, i'll write what I want as a retort, and have the last laugh, because dingus here can't say anything back!"

It's a disgrace, the simple minds of the responses meant to make no sense, to aggravate their opposition is a mindset that is frankly, pointless.

You just keep going jmtb, sooner or later the world will attempt to crush everybody, at that point you can only sink or swim my friends, sink or swim.

</rant>

YOU ARE SUCH A WOLLERY NAB STICKNUGGET FOR BLATANTLY MISRETRIEVING HIS HONEST TRUTH-BORN RIGHT TO FREE EXPRESS HIS KNOWLEDGE. YOU MUST TRY OUT THE MODEST APPROACH OF THINKING THROUGH YOUR APPLICATION BEFORE SUBMITTING REVIEWS THAT ENTRINSICALLY HAVE SANDY FOUNDATION IN PLAGIACAL NIGHT PICKLES!!!!

Yeah, another great example of a the rampant NG 13 yr old angsty kid. I saw the same animation and I was thrown for a loop as to its point also.

P.S. Are you asian?

Absolutely. Well, half. The other half is Lithuanian and Irish.

i know how you feel many newgrounders believe that "reviews" are actually "praise" and dont take well to criticism, oh well what can you do.

It's almost comical that these people are the ones that are constantly pulled into thinking that an opposing party is amazing (due to policy promises with very shallow evidence and reasoning), just to complain once again when said new party is in power...
I'm actally in the UK, but I think you can think of a party this relates to...

KILL IT

And this is just the tip of the iceberg of problems with reviews on newgrounds.

To add to the topic, I'll talk about the Yes, No and Abusive respond buttons to the reviws.

The "yes" and "no" are useless functions, but at least they doesn't ruin anything .

The Abusive button (also known as Boost Average Review Points button) is completely idiotic. I have a habbit of only going though the 0-5 reviews because they are either the most entertaining or usefull. But since the abusive button came to NG, then every review under 8 gest marked as "abusive" and eventually, removed.

And as you nearly says yourself, the un-written rule is: If the review isn't ball-licking, then it's spam.

And the higher score it got, the harder is it to get some criticism though.

I HEART YOUR GAMES D:!

It's just an animation that's meant to fit to a song. I don't see why it should be made such a big deal out of. Honestly all your doing is saying, "I disagree with the response to my review." and complaining about it. Just let it be...

Discovery. jmtb02 is part asian. Second. maybe he support the anarchy?

Let me ask you something, you being a mod and all. Who deletes the reviews? Do they have special mods to do that?

There are specific review mods set up that take a look at flagged reviews. I am merely a forum mod, so my job isn't to regulate any other part of the site.

You have to keep in mind that these are kids (most between the ages of nine and fourteen).
They have no idea what they're talking about and do not comprehend the government or current events whatsoever. However, they hear their misinformed parents and other kids at school rant about how "we have no freedom" and whatnot, and believe themselves to be incredibly intelligent and 'cool' to "fight the system".
Rebellion and violence are two of the most appealing things to these children, so the whole concept is very "fun", and anyone who agrees with them in "cool" and anyone who does not is a "mindless loser".
Hence the 'yes' and 'no' difference.

The movie only really deserved the 3.80 it passed with. However, thanks to other kids just like this one, it's risen to 4.19.
Read the other reviews. They're all like "YEAH LETS DO IT! IT'S THE ONLY WAY WE CAN END THE OPPRESSION! I WISH OTHER PEOPLE WOULD JOIN US IN A REVOLT JUST LIKE THIS! WE'RE NOT GONNA TAKE IT!"
They have no idea what 'oppression' even means (and most don't even come close to spelling it correctly either).

The main thing that irritates me about this is the blatant and unjustified arrogance of the kid who made it.
What is wrong with that kid?

Anyway, completely agree about your assessment of the review system. I have a lot more that I hate about it, but I really don't feel like ranting at the moment.

Man jmtbo2 fuck him I mean he can't be acting all proud he did kinda steal that cartoon (I've been looking for the original author I remember the original Author released it here a couple of months ago. I think in August or September.
Don't let him get you down he's just acting like that cause he knows he got away with it if anyone finds the original one PM Tom or me so we can bring it up to Him

I actually did notice that too it was in the portal a couple of months ago well if you find it tell me although since 100's of cartoons are submitted daily I doubt we'll find it I'm just gonna try searching words like rebel,we're not gonna,Twisted Sister just stuff like that and see if anything comes up
Well I'll be looking

<a href="http://brock-janson.newgrounds.com/">http://brock-janson.newgrounds.com/</a>
look what I found Alhough I may still need more proof then this so I'll try PM'ing him
Well I found it under the-rebels

Also it's funny that the flash got a 3.60 which is what the cartoon really deserves
(Maybe .60 threw .80) and The other guys got a 4.20 hahaha hilarious I guess the little kids were off of NG that day

too bad you already made a new post so you can't see grlsmacker's post , but I think the we're not gonna take it thing is stolen?
Well if you could respond if you see this then thx if you don't respond I'll post it in your new post